Criterion
|
Pts
|
Insufficient
|
Limited
|
Adequate
|
Proficient
|
Exceptional
|
Format
|
10
|
Elements
missing; incorrect margins, font, spacing, bibliography, endnotes. (0 – 2 pt)
|
Some
elements missing; flaws that detract from flow of paper
(3
– 4 pt)
|
All
elements present with occasional mistakes
(5
– 6 pt)
|
All
elements well-presented and flows smoothly
(7
– 8 pt)
|
All
elements thoroughly presented, extremely well-organized, no flaws
(9
– 10 pt)
|
Student Scores
| ||||||
Mechanics
|
50
|
Frequent
errors, seriously impairs flow & meaning of paper
(0
– 9 pt)
|
Regular
errors; flow/meaning of paper breaks down
(10
– 19 pt)
|
Errors
noticeable, and occasionally detract from flow or meaning of paper
(20
– 29 pt)
|
Some
errors, which are minor in nature and don’t detract from overall meaning of
paper
(30
– 39 pt)
|
Essentially
faultless; errors may result from risk-taking and do not detract from meaning
of paper. (40 – 50 pt)
|
Student Scores
| ||||||
Organization
|
50
|
Elements
missing; minimal organization and lack of flow; understanding seriously
impaired
(0
– 9 pt)
|
Regular
breaks in organization impede flow and meaning
(10
– 19 pt)
|
Occasional
disorganization within paragraphs, but paragraph organization well presented.
(20
– 29 pt)
|
Well
organized and flows smoothly; no distractions in organization;
(30
– 39 pt)
|
All
sentences and paragraphs flow well; smooth and logical flow; crisp and clear
(40
– 50 pt)
|
Student Scores
| ||||||
Content
|
50
|
Little
to no examination of data; failure to present relevant information
(0
– 9 pt)
|
Some
examination of data; little evaluation of material; little understanding of
relevant information
(10
– 19 pt)
|
Adequate
understanding and examination of data; some attempts to incorporate material
into paper
(20
– 29 pt)
|
Skillful
examination shows strong degree of evaluation; strong understanding of
various points of argument
(30
– 39 pt)
|
Demonstrates
thorough examination of data; shows ability to evaluate; reveals mature
insight
(40
– 50 pt)
|
Student Scores
| ||||||
Thesis/Position
|
15
|
Position
incomplete; support ineffective; explanation minimal
(0
– 3 pt)
|
Positions
partially presented; weak information; lack of relevant details.
(4
– 6 pt)
|
Position
substantially presented; some imbalance in positions and missing or gaps in
explanation. (7 – 9 pt)
|
Position
completely presented, relevant, accurate, clear and well-explained. (10 – 12 pt)
|
All
positions thoroughly presented; each point clearly explained; relevant and
accurate support of positions
(13
– 15 pt)
|
Student Scores
| ||||||
Presentation
|
25
|
Unprepared;
unorganized; no eye contact; too casual
(0
– 4 pt)
|
Shared
minimal information; occasional eye contact
(5
– 9 pt)
|
Good
organization; shared relevant and interested information
(10
– 14 pt)
|
Well-organized;
material interests and engages audience; very good eye contact. (15 – 19 pt)
|
Flawless
presentation; covers key information; confident, engaging
(20
– 25 pt)
|
Student Scores
|
Total Score – 200 possible
points
No comments:
Post a Comment