|
Criterion
|
Points
|
Insufficient
|
Limited
|
Adequate
|
Proficient
|
Exceptional
|
|
Format
|
25
|
Many elements missing;
incorrect margins, font, spacing, citations
(0 – 4 pt)
|
Some elements missing; flaws
that detract from flow of paper
(5 – 9 pt)
|
All elements present with
occasional mistakes
(10 – 14 pt)
|
All elements well-presented
and flows smoothly
(15 – 19 pt)
|
All elements thoroughly
presented, extremely well-organized, no flaws
(20 – 25 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focus: Thesis,
Introduction, Conclusion
|
25
|
No thesis statement and
specific topic unclear; lacks a clear introduction; no conclusion
(0 – 4 pt)
|
Specific topic is clear, but
thesis statement with opinion/stand is missing; weak introduction that states
topic, but missing clear thesis; no direction for paper. Conclusion does not summarize the main
points nor restates the thesis statement.
(5 – 9 pt)
|
Thesis and topic clearly
stated. Introduction states the topic and
specific thesis, but does not give focus or direction to the paper. Conclusion restates the thesis, but does
not satisfactory sum up the main points of the paper.
(10 – 14 pt)
|
Relevant and accurate thesis
statement that suits the topic. Introduction
states topic and thesis and gives clear direction to the paper. Conclusion reiterates main points and
restates the thesis statement.
(15 – 19 pt)
|
Thoughtful and compelling
thesis statement that shows original ideas related to the subject. Strong introduction that grabs attention
and directs the course of the paper. Strong
conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates the thesis statement.
(20 – 25 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization
|
50
|
Elements missing; minimal
organization and lack of flow; understanding seriously impaired
(0 – 9 pt)
|
Some major points covered; regular
breaks in organization impede flow and meaning
(10 – 19 pt)
|
Certain major points
covered; occasional disorganization within paragraphs, but paragraph
organization appropriate
(20 – 29 pt)
|
Most major points covered; well
organized and flows smoothly; no distractions in organization
(30 – 39 pt)
|
All sentences and paragraphs
flow well; smooth and logical flow; crisp and clear
(40 – 50 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content
|
50
|
Little to no understanding
of topic, examination of data, evaluation of material, or presentation of relevant
information; insufficient research
(0 – 9 pt)
|
Some understanding of
relevant information, examination of data, and evaluation of material;
minimal research
(10 – 19 pt)
|
Satisfactory understanding
and examination of data; relevant material incorporated; moderate research
(20 – 29 pt)
|
Capable examination shows
strong degree of evaluation; strong understanding of various points of
argument; skillful research
(30 – 39 pt)
|
Demonstrates thorough
examination of data; shows ability to evaluate; reveals mature insight;
superb research
(40 – 50 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanics
|
50
|
Frequent errors, seriously
impairs flow & meaning of paper
(0 – 9 pt)
|
Regular errors; flow/meaning
of paper breaks down
(10 – 19 pt)
|
Errors noticeable, and
occasionally detract from flow or meaning of paper
(20 – 29 pt)
|
Some errors, which are minor
in nature and don’t detract from overall meaning of paper
(30 – 39 pt)
|
Essentially faultless;
errors may result from risk-taking and do not detract from meaning of paper
(40 – 50 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation
|
25
|
Unprepared; unorganized; no
eye contact; too casual
(0 – 4 pt)
|
Shared minimal information;
occasional eye contact
(5 – 9 pt)
|
Good organization; shared
relevant and interested information
(10 – 14 pt)
|
Well-organized; material
interests and engages audience; very good eye contact. (15 – 19 pt)
|
Flawless presentation;
covers key information; confident, engaging
(20 – 25 pt)
|
|
Student Scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score – 225 possible points
Total Score:
No comments:
Post a Comment